Thank you! Your submission has been received. We will get in touch with you soon.
Back to site
.png)
Discover how online counterfeiting impacts a brand’s distribution, reputation, and digital trust. A strategic perspective on online brand protection.
We are in the middle of World Cup season, and this week Spain won on the pitch. But outside of it, a much quieter match is being played.
The Spanish National Team’s second kit—designed as a tribute to the country’s literary heritage—sold out on Adidas’ official website.
And yet, it is still being sold.
Outside official channels. In nearly identical copies. Just one click away.
For many buyers, it may seem like just another jersey.
For a brand, it is a sign of something much deeper: an online counterfeiting problem that affects distribution, reputation, and consumer trust.
And this is precisely where online brand protection stops being a legal issue and becomes a strategic priority.
In this article, you will discover
Most brands still believe that counterfeiting is the problem.
It isn’t.
Counterfeiting is the symptom.
The real problem is that brands are losing control over how they exist online.
A counterfeit jersey does not appear on its own.
It comes with an entire infrastructure:
Each of these elements is often treated as a separate issue.
And that is where the real problem begins.
When a counterfeit jersey appears, it is not only an intellectual property right that is violated.
A chain of consequences is triggered, affecting multiple areas of the business simultaneously.
Behind these copies, there is rarely a single independent seller.
As noted by ANDEMA, this market is directly linked to organizations that profit from illicit activities and operate outside the quality, safety, and compliance standards required of legitimate brands.
This means that every counterfeit product not only diverts revenue.
It also helps finance criminal networks operating on an international scale.
The data proves it.
In a joint operation involving Spain’s National Police, INTERPOL, EUROPOL, EUIPO, and OLAF, authorities seized 66,000 counterfeit jerseys, equivalent to more than 16 tons of merchandise.
That is not an incident.
It is a market.
One of the most complex challenges in online brand protection is the proliferation of unauthorized sellers and parallel distribution channels.
Although they do not always sell counterfeit products, they contribute to the loss of commercial control and the erosion of the brand experience.
When a product sells out through official channels but continues to appear elsewhere, the brand loses something more valuable than a sale.
It loses control.
In practice, this erodes margins, creates conflicts with authorized distributors, and undermines the consistency of the commercial strategy.
This is where one of the most invisible—and potentially most dangerous—costs emerges.
Consumers who buy an almost identical copy do not think they are purchasing a counterfeit.
They believe they are buying your brand.
And when that jersey fades, tears, or fails to meet expectations, the disappointment does not fall on the counterfeiter.
It falls on you.
From a digital trust perspective, this is what truly matters.
Consumers can no longer easily distinguish between legitimate and fraudulent experiences.
The aggregate impact is enormous.
According to EUIPO data, the apparel sector loses nearly €1 billion annually in Spain due to counterfeiting.
This is not an abstract figure.
It is demand leaving official channels.
It is value being transferred to illegitimate actors.
It is growth that never happens.
When Every Department Sees a Different Problem
This is a reality that many organizations have yet to fully recognize.
The issue is not only counterfeiting.
The issue is how it is managed.
Within the same company, the same risk is often interpreted differently:
Everyone is observing the same phenomenon.
But each department analyzes only one piece of it.
This is what we call fragmented ownership of digital risk.
And the consequences are very real:
When each department fights its own battle separately, no one is fighting the entire ecosystem.
Meanwhile, threats continue to grow in a coordinated manner.
Many organizations already have dashboards, alerts, and monitoring systems.
The problem is no longer visibility.
The problem is prioritization.
Because not all threats have the same impact.
A counterfeit jersey sold through a profile with one hundred followers does not pose the same risk as a coordinated network of sellers capturing demand during the launch of a sold-out kit.
The difference between reacting and protecting lies in intelligence.
This means identifying which threats generate a real impact on revenue, reputation, or consumer trust, and acting on those first.
It is not about eliminating more incidents.
It is about eliminating the right ones.
A modern online brand protection strategy requires:
Because brand protection is no longer just about removing infringements.
It is about protecting digital trust.
A counterfeit Spanish National Team jersey is not simply an infringement.
It is the visible manifestation of a risk ecosystem that includes online counterfeiting, unauthorized sellers, grey market activity, loss of distribution control, and reputational damage.
That is why online brand protection can no longer be approached as a collection of isolated incidents.
Organizations that successfully protect their reputation and preserve digital trust are those that understand how these threats connect and take action against the entire ecosystem.
If your organization is struggling with online counterfeiting, unauthorized sellers, or loss of control over its digital presence, it may be time to evaluate how exposed your brand really is.
Online brand protection is the set of strategies, processes, and technologies designed to detect, monitor, and eliminate digital threats affecting a brand. This includes counterfeiting, unauthorized sellers, fraudulent websites, trademark misuse, and other risks that can impact a company’s revenue and reputation.
Online counterfeiting causes financial losses, but it also damages consumer trust, harms brand reputation, and reduces control over distribution. When consumers have a negative experience with a counterfeit product, the impact often falls on the legitimate brand.
Counterfeiting involves the sale of products that infringe intellectual property rights by imitating a brand without authorization. The grey market distributes genuine products through unauthorized channels. Although the products are authentic, this practice can still affect commercial strategy and customer experience.
Unauthorized sellers are companies or individuals who sell a brand’s products without being part of its official distribution network. Their activities can affect pricing, create commercial conflicts, and reduce the brand’s ability to control the customer experience.
Detecting online counterfeits requires monitoring marketplaces, social media platforms, search engines, advertising networks, and independent websites. Many companies use artificial intelligence-powered tools to identify threats at scale and prioritize those that have the greatest business impact.
Because consumers increasingly struggle to distinguish between legitimate and fraudulent experiences. When customers buy a counterfeit product believing it is genuine, the resulting loss of trust is usually directed at the brand rather than the counterfeiter.
Effective protection requires continuous monitoring, risk analysis, enforcement actions, and a unified view of digital threats. Leading organizations integrate counterfeiting, fraud, unauthorized sellers, and online reputation into a single brand protection strategy.
